NFL pioneer’s boyhood home may become historic San Antonio landmark, despite owner’s opposition

Scott Huddleston, Staff writer

San Antonio Express-News

Jan. 28, 2021 Updated: Jan. 28, 2021 7:36 p.m.

A 1921 Craftsman bungalow in the Beacon Hill area north of downtown, the boyhood home of one of San Antonio’s first athletes to play in the National Football League, appears headed for historic landmark designation by the City Council in the spring.

But it’s not a done deal.

There are those who say granting landmark status for the house at 1206 W. Agarita St. seems too much like punishing the owner.

Commissioner Gabriel Velasquez of the city’s Historic Design and Review Commission opposes the designation, saying it would be “an abuse of the intention of the designation to single out a property” whose owner, after initially seeking demolition, now is preserving it.

“It gives the appearance of a consequence, of a penalty, and in this case it’s a consequence and a penalty for doing the right thing,” Velasquez said.

But fellow commissioners disagreed; they voted 7-2 for landmark designation last week. The City Council will have the final say in April.

If landmark status is awarded, the current and future owners would be eligible to receive local tax incentives for structural rehabilitation, but would have to secure approval from the city for exterior work.

On ExpressNews.com: NFL great’s boyhood home may become historic

Rodrigo Velasquez, whose family now owns the house — no relation to the HDRC commissioner — said it’s poorly timed implementation of new regulations occurring after the house and others in the neighborhood already have been altered through window replacements, additions and other changes.

“We just feel it’s a little unfair, that it’s raising our costs, when we have competitors now that are also renovating in that area that don’t have to go through that historic designation,” Rodrigo Velasquez said.

The city’s Office of Historic Preservation and Beacon Hill Area Neighborhood Association have said the house qualifies as a landmark for its architectural features; its ties to the late Damon Tassos, who played in the NFL in the 1940s, and his family, which was active in the local Greek community; and its significance and contribution to the neighborhood, which the preservation office has determined itself is eligible for historic district status.

Cosima Colvin, co-chair of the neighborhood association’s zoning and urban design committee, said a landmark designation proposed for the house had “overwhelming support” from residents.

The family that now owns the property filed a demolition request in August, with plans to develop town homes on a half-acre tract, but since has withdrawn the demolition application and is returning the house to its original appearance.

“The pressure that our neighborhood is under for development and redevelopment has reopened the conversation of going historic, and we look forward to working with OHP to reintroduce the concept to our membership so that we have a robust conversation of the pros and cons,” Colvin told the commission.

The case tentatively is set for consideration by the Zoning Commission on March 2, with final action by the City Council on April 1.

The council had unanimously passed a resolution in December to start the designation process.

Despite the preservation office’s efforts to engage the public on potentially historic properties and to be more proactive on initiating designations, many houses and building are given landmark status only after an owner has sought demolition.

HDRC Commissioner Curtis Fish spoke in favor of declaring the house a landmark.

“This project isn’t one that’s been singled out,” Fish said. “We see a number of cases that are initiated by demolition requests.”

Rodrigo Velasquez said he will appeal the commission’s decision to the City Council because he believes the landmark decision would be onerous.

He pointed out that instead of tearing down the house and building town homes there, he’s rehabbing the house and developing two single-family residences on the tract.

Tassos memories

Cynthia Tassos Phillips, a daughter of Damon Tassos, has a unique perspective, with memories of her grandparents’ home and stories of her father, aunt and uncle having grown up there on Agarita.

She remembers the rambling porch; a bathroom, the only one in the house at the time, that had black wallpaper covered with pink flamingos; and the tantalizing aromas of olive oil, oregano, garlic, lemon juice and spices used in pastitsio, a baked pasta dish, and other Greek culinary staples.

Her grandfather, Gus Tassos and his brother, Charles Tassos, had come to the United States after World War I, seeking economic opportunity, and built two houses on Agarita in 1921. Charles was a trustee and founding member of St. Sophia’s Greek Orthodox Church, established in 1924.

“They came to America with nothing, like many people did back in those days, and worked hard, made the kids work hard, made the grandkids work hard,” Cynthia Tassos said. “I could tell you exactly where everything is in that house, and I loved every bit of it — and have the best memories.”

Her father, Damon Gus Tassos, played football at Jefferson High School, became a team captain at Texas A&M and went on to the NFL, playing as a guard and linebacker for the Detroit Lions and Green Bay Packers from 1945 to 1949.

He was known as “The Greek” in sports circles. San Antonio Express-News archives show he had five interceptions, kicked three extra points and played alongside such early NFL Hall of Fame figures as Don Hutson, Sammy Baugh and Sid Luckman.

At Texas A&M, Tassos was in a group of freshmen and sophomore players called the “Kiddie Korps,” since the team’s upperclassmen all had been called away to duty in World War II.

After his NFL career, Tassos owned Damon’s restaurant at Austin Highway and Broadway. His cousin, Bill Tassos, opened the Barn Door in 1953. The well-known steakhouse still operates under the same name but with different ownership.

Damon Tassos died in 2001.

His daughter said the family often gathered on weekends at her grandparents’ house on Agarita, sharing tight bonds among siblings and cousins.

Her grandmother, Marguerite Tassos, purchased a donkey that had been housed in a barn in Brackenridge Park and kept it in a lot next to the house.

Phillips remembers learning to ride a bike on Agarita, getting in spear grass fights with her cousins and sprawling out on the floor with her “Papi,” Gus Tassos, when she spent the night with her grandparents.

But her favorite family tales center on her father. Her grandmother didn’t want him to play football, and made sure he attended Greek school before enrolling at Jefferson, she said.

One oft-told story was how her father negotiated his terms of employment with with the NFL over the phone, long before players had agents to handle such matters. Detroit Lions Coach Gus Dorais asked Tassos to “name his price.”

“And Daddy said he took a big gulp of air and said, ‘How about $2,500 for a signing bonus?” Phillips recalled. Dorais “said, ‘We’ll put you on the next plane to Detroit tomorrow.’ And Daddy said it took 24 hours to get to Detroit. But he left 1206 West Agarita, and that was the beginning of his football career.”

Scott Huddleston is a veteran staff writer at the San Antonio Express-News covering Bexar County Commissioners Court and county government.

He has been a reporter at the Express-News since 1985, covering a variety of issues, including public safety, flooding, transportation, military and veterans affairs, history and local government.

Huddleston covered the final construction phase of the SBC Center — now AT&T Center, where the Spurs play — in 2002, and wrote “Then&Now,” a weekly historical feature, for the Sunday Metro section from 2001-2006.

UDC Updates for OHP and HDRC

The following update is from Monica Savino of the Dignowity Hill Historic District:

Hey All-

I want to bring to your attention a very important project going on right now that will effect all of us living in Historic, RIO, and Downtown, Neighborhood Conservation Districts, and those who own designated Landmarks.  AND those who are interested in designating their neighborhood, portion of as part of any of the above cited districts or a landmark. 

OHP has been working with various stakeholders and DSD as a task force in the process to update those UDC ordinances that effect their purview.  The draft will be available to the public soon before it goes on the road to City Council and I would urge each of you to make a point to review it when that copy is made public.  Again, I don’t have a date but want to get you in the loop now.  In the meantime, I can give you a synopsis of what’s being addressed.  If any of you want more specific info, please feel free to reply to me directly.

OVERVIEW

  • Streamline review process and optimize public participation
  • Improve consistency, predictability, and effectiveness of review
  • Shorten length of public meetings, reduce commission burnout
  • Align with 2020 UDC Update Cycle or other process (CCR, policy change, etc.)

STEPS TAKEN

  • Worked with task force to recommend policy changes
  • Public input will also inform the recommendations prior to any proposed amendments (me: and this is where you come in!)
  • Subcommittees formed to review the following issues:
    • HDRC and administrative review process
    • Non-owner landmark designation process
    • Neighborhood-level infill design standards
    • Downtown and RIO
    • Other clarifying amendments and minor process improvements.

____________________

To give you an example of subjects we’re discussing for HDRC/Admin topic, there’s talk of increasing the size and configuration of HDRC.  Maybe larger with alternates, maybe creating a separate review group for smaller projects, non-conforming work, or other criteria.  Also, there’s discussion about expanding the Administrative Review authority (staff approval) that would increase the range of work able to be processed through an Administrative CoA and how to effectively include public comments.

Non-owner landmark designations might have different method for “petitioning” a neighborhood for a building or place landmark along with higher standards of significance.

The Neighborhood Infill topic is very involved as you can guess.  There’s talk of application worksheets that will address design criteria such as massing, scale, and context areas, and a new process that will address the problem of infill that requires rezoning.  What comes first, the chicken or the egg?  What might happen is some sort of hybrid chicken-egg that puts OHP in the driver seat for design related criteria before zoning approvals are given.  This isn’t the same as HDRC review but something geared for the zoning process.  It’s still in the works and for that reason the Neighborhood Infill group will continue to meet in the coming months to hopefully have a robust yet efficient process in place for next year.

Same with Downtown and RIO – lots of details and work need to be done.  And there are other items and concerns we’ve been discussing with the intention of making the submittal processes in OHP more responsive to neighborhoods, consistent, and efficient for all participants.

So . . .  If you have a specific topic interest or general interest, have questions or want to keep up with the process, please let me know so that I can keep you in the loop.  This UDC revision is a very important activity that happens only once every 5 years and the revisions will effect all of us.  I encourage you to get involved.

Cheers,
Monica S.

The Curious Case of the Cole Houses: Demolishing 307 & 311 E. Evergreen

Tobin Hill is under fire, y’all. I’ve posted about it before: 14 demolition requests in the last 18 months.

Map courtesy OHP, showing demolition requests within the THCA boundary over the last 18 months.

There are a few ways to stop or slow a demolition.

One way is a large community outcry, such as what happened with 430 and 434 E. Magnolia (OHP stated that they had never received that much community input on a demolition case, that it was unprecedented).

Another way is submitting an application for finding of Historic Significance, and Landmark Designation with the City’s Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). This can often be a more effective way if the property in question has real historic significance.

307 and 311 E. Evergreen had both community support for their preservation, and substantial historic significance.

When Tobin Hill received the notification of a demolition request for these two houses on E. Evergreen, I posted the photos of the house with information provided by OHP to our social media pages, and I forwarded the request to Tobin Hill Community Association’s Historic Preservation Committee. THCA also met with Patrick Christensen, a local land use attorney, representing Imagine Homes who hoped to develop, but did not yet own, the properties.

When I posted the info on 307 and 311 E. Evergreen, now colloquially know as the Cole Houses, there was a huge outcry from the community, even extending beyond the borders of the Tobin Hill.

Let’s take a moment and talk about what I mean when I say, “huge outcry.”

The post was shared 64 times. 13,699 people saw the post. Between the comments on THCA’s Facebook page and other places it was shared, I compiled 75 comments asking for the preservation of these houses. So when OHP says 24 emails is “unprecedented,” and I tell you Evergreen has a “huge outcry,” you understand what I mean.

Many of the comments talk about the houses’ recent history as being used as a live music venue and recording studio. If you know Tobin Hill, you know music is an important part of our neighborhood’s culture. Additionally, one of the houses was the former offices of Mujeres Unidas, an HIV prevention and awareness non-profit.

Among the folks upset about the potential demolition of the Evergreen houses, was an archaeologist and historian that lives in the neighborhood, Stephen Fonzo. He agreed to assist THCA’s Historic Preservation Committee Chair, Ricki Kushner, in researching the houses pro bono. They discovered that in addition to the houses recent musical history, the house at 307 was the only home of Lt. Col. Robert G. Cole, WWII hero and recipient of the Medal of Honor. Robert G. Cole Junior and Senior High School are named for him (thus the nickname of Cole Houses).

Ricki and Stephen compiled a thorough Statement of Significance for each of the houses, and included letters of support from the North Saint Mary’s Business Association, the San Antonio Conservation Society, news clippings, photos, maps, emails, and statements of support from veterans. Together the packets on 307 and 311 E Evergreen are a combined total of 84 pages after review by OHP.

It is with this level of community support AND historically significant evidence that the Cole Houses went before HDRC for recommendation of Landmark designation.

The HDRC recommended approval at the April 17, 2019 hearing. However, because the Landmark designation was filed without the owner’s consent, THCA was told that it would have to go before City Council in June before continuing to the Zoning Commission.

On May 28, 2019 the Community Association received an email from Councilman Treviño’s office about the two pending cases in our neighborhood. Included in the communication was Patrick Christensen.

The email stated that Councilman Treviño was not going to support the designation of the Evergreen properties. His reason was that the Cole Houses are “on the commercial corner of the McCullough corridor.” However, the houses are NOT on the corner of McCullough; they are behind the Little Taco Factory and La Morenita Fruit Cups.  

Location of 307 and 311 E Evergreen St.

All 84 pages of historical evidence were ignored. Instead, the Councilman focused solely on the location of the houses.

In addition to the blow of this email, when the case came before City Council on June 6, 2019, OHP failed to present the evidence of the Cole Houses historic significance, or give Council a briefing on the houses before the hearing.

At the City Council hearing, the mayor noted that the Council was not briefed on the houses, not once, but twice. Sadly, Council voted against the designation based on Councilman Treviño’s recommendation anyway. He stated that the houses “do not warrant landmark status.”

In the video below, you can hear Ricki Kushner and other citizens speak to City Council about this case. Councilman Treviño’s makes his statement at 15:50. The Mayor states that there was not a staff presentation on this case at 20:30. He repeats that statement at 21:40, where he also asks for more information on these houses, and states his discomfort with the decision being made without a briefing.

Normally that would be the end of things. Without the owner’s consent or Council’s blessing the case can not move forward. But THCA was not ready to give up after so much work.

Several members of THCA attended the June 24th HDRC Hearing and signed up to speak during Citizens To Be Heard. We implored the Commission to intercede, reminding them that although the Landmark Designation had failed, they houses could still be preserved as a Historic District, which only needs a minimum of two properties. We reminded them of the evidence to preserve these houses, and told them about OHP’s failure to present the evidence to Council. HDRC asked that the houses be added to the July 17, 2019 agenda.

Meanwhile, the owner had erected a fence around the properties, preparing to demolish them. THCA was ready with an appeal, in order to get a stop-work order on the demolition if needed. However, on June 25, 2019, the Development Services Department (DSD) confirmed that a hold was placed once again on the addresses due to being on the July 17th agenda.

Late in the afternoon on Friday July 12, OHP called THCA to let them know that they were lifting the hold, and that the demolition requests for the Cole Houses had been approved. THCA searched for permits, but none had been pulled yet. We vigilantly watched the houses over the weekend for any sign of illegal demolition. None occurred.

Tuesday morning, July 16, my husband, Rick, drove by the houses at about 7:50am. Demolition (deconstruction) had begun.

I called DSD at about 9:30 a.m. and they confirmed that there had not been any demolition permits issued for the addresses. We requested a stop-work order.

Rick immediately called the Councilman’s office and was told by Chrissy McCain that demolition permits had been approved. She also said that the structures were completely demolished by this point (about 9:35 a.m.), so if THCA was to file an appeal, it would likely fail because the properties were demolished. Further, she said that the Councilman had approved the salvage plan just that morning.

Alarmed, I drove to the Cole Houses, to find them still standing, though deconstruction of the interior was occurring. I checked DSD’s online permit portal, which now showed a permit for 311 E Evergreen, approved at 9:51am and paid for at 10:23am that morning.

We went to DSD and filed the appeal.

The appeal was received by Zenon (Zeke) Solis, who was really not sure what to do. He stated that they had never received an appeal on a demolition permit before. He went back to the offices several times to ask questions before taking my paperwork. He then took 19 minutes to copy the appeal, which was only 9 pages long. Another stop-work order was issued.

The next day, July 17, we received notice from DSD that our appeal was being withdrawn by DSD and that THCA would receive a refund. View the emails from DSD here:

The stop-work order has again been lifted. Deconstruction has resumed. The Cole Houses are being demolished.

We are left with many questions.

Why did Councilman Treviño state that the Cole Houses were on the corner of McCullough when they are not?

Why did his office include the developer’s attorney, Patrick Christensen, in the email prior to the Council hearing, but not the property owner?

Why didn’t OHP brief the Mayor and the Council on the 84 pages of evidence for Landmarking the houses?

Why did the Council proceed to vote, even after the mayor questioned this?

Why were the Cole Houses removed from the July 17th HDRC agenda, despite the commissioner’s request to evaluate them for a potential Historic District?

Why did the Councilman’s office preemptively discourage us from filing an appeal, even though it is within our rights to do so?

Why was the Councilman’s office giving permission for demolition instead of requiring that a permit be obtained though DSD prior to starting work?

Why did the Councilman’s office state that the houses had already been demolished before the demolition permits had been either filed or paid for?

Why did DSD refund THCA’s appeal and decide that it was not valid? – Is it not the role of the Board of Adjustment to decide if an appeal has merit?

It is all just so very curious.

UDC Committees – What you need to know

Updated as needed.

Unified Development Codes (UDC) Changes Happening Now 

The UDC changes are happening now and it is important for neighborhoods to be involved. There are neighborhood leaders sitting on those committees, but we all need to be attending and supporting those leaders with input and help.
Several committees and technical working groups (TWG) are meeting now:

The Removing Code Related Barriers for Affordable Housing Committee (RBAH)

What it is: This committee will look at the recommendations made by the Mayor’s Housing Task Force and will will focus on minimum lot size, building setbacks, street construction standards, utilities, storm water management, parks and open space requirements, and tree preservation among other recommendations and idea

Why it is important: The kind of “by right” incentives for mixed-unit projects may be controversial. There is an effort to focus on non-profit affordable housing producers instead of giving more incentives to pro-profit developers for market rate housing. Read Rich Acosta’s (My City is My Home) remarks at the first meeting about the problems non-profit developers of affordable housing face.

Meetings: Meetings will be the second Monday of the month until December at 11:30 p.m. at One Stop (1901 S. Alamo) Board Room. RBAH meetings will be suspended while the subcommittees meet (see below).

Next Meeting: The task force has been divided into subcommittees: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), Public Outreach, and Regulatory Cost Burdens. The regular task force will not meet for a while to give time for the committees to complete their work.

T1NC Contact: Cynthia Spielman

Other: Meeting minutes and information

CoSA Department: Neighborhood and Housing Services Department (NHSD) – Kristen Flores

Subcommittee Meetings held at NHSD at 1400 S. Flores

 Removing Barriers to Affordable Housing Public Engagement & Outreach 
• Wednesday, October 30th from 1:00 pm – 2:00 pm  • Wednesday, November 20th from 1:00 pm – 2:00 pm  • Wednesday, December 11th from 1:00 pm – 2:00 pm 
Accessory Dwelling Units 
• Friday, November 1st from 10 am – 11:30 am  • Friday, November 22nd from 10 am – 11:30 am  • Friday, December 13th from 10 am – 11:30 am 
Regulatory Cost Burden 
• Wednesday, November 6th from 2 pm – 3 pm  • Tuesday, November 26th from 2 pm – 3 pm  • Wednesday, December 18th from 2 pm – 3 pm 

The UDC Task Force – Historic/OHP/HDRC

What it is: The Historic UDC Task Force is working on UDC for historic districts and the process for designation. Read update from Monica Savino.

Why is important: This task force is not only important for historic districts: Design codes could be the model for any form-based codes that they City may consider in the future for compatible infill. Meetings will take place every two weeks from 3 – 5 p.m. on Thursdays from July 11 to September 12, 2019 at One Stop (1901 S. Alamo).

Next Meeting: This committee has adjourned. Its recommendations will presented in other committees and boards. Schedule TBA

T1NC Contact:  Tony Garcia or Monica Savino

CoSA Department: Office of Historic Preservation (OHP)

MF-33/RM-4 Committee

What it is: MF/RM Committee is working through issues about those lots zoned MF-33/RM-4 in our neighborhoods.  This committee is a result of a CCR by D1 Councilman Trevino. Read MF/RM Task Force Issues and MF/RM Task Force Update

They are also working on, at his request, Denver’s ordinance restricting or banning “slot homes” condos or apartments crowded into a lot that face one another which have been the model for developers in the downtown neighborhoods. There has been an effort to include a representative from the Westside and Denver Heights because they will be directly affected but DSD has denied the requests for inclusion.

Why it is important: Cosima Colvin explains how important this issue is on Tier One Neighborhood Coalition Face Book page:   “Several of the T1NC Neighborhoods are on the Task Force and have worked with other T1NC members on an ad hoc committee to develop language that will address the concerns that many of our neighborhoods have regarding these two zoning categories and how to balance developers’ “by right” development choices with neighborhood preservation. We strongly urge neighborhoods to check DSD’s Zoning Map webpage to see where you may have RM4 and/or MF33 Zoning in your neighborhoods and understand what those zoning districts/categories will allow. More info is available here: https://www.sanantonio.gov/DSD/Resources/Codes#233873531-rm-4–mf-33-ccr

So far neighborhood representatives are facing stiff opposition from the development community on the committee and need support. See Mary Johnson’s (Committee member and President of Monte Vista Terrace) interview here .

Next Meeting: This committee has adjourned. Recommendations will be reviewed by PCTAC on Monday, October 21st at 9 a.m. at Board Room at Development Services, 1901 S Alamo St.

T1NC Contact: Mary Johnson

CoSA Department: Development Services Department (DSD) – Catherine Hernandez

Demolitions Lead to Increased Property Taxes

On April 14, 2019, Bexar County Chief Appraiser, Michael Amezquita told the San Antonio Express News that the “biggest horror shows” when it comes to property tax increases are, “Anything within 3 miles of the Pearl.” Among many near-downtown neighborhoods, he specifically called out Tobin Hill North.

In 2016 a developer bought two older but structurally sound duplexes at 421 and 425 E. Mistletoe Ave. in Tobin Hill North. They obtained a demolition permit, cleared the land and built six two-story houses, facing a center drive. In some cities, they call these slot homes, and in 2018, Denver passed an ordinance which does not allow themto be built there any longer. The houses on Mistletoe were completed this spring and they sold for between $325,000 and $370,000 each. And they are driving our property taxes up.

Of course, most people will tell you is that these new, two-story houses will not be used as a comparable property with our older, single-story bungalows and cottages. They are right, the improvements portion of your tax valuation won’t use these new houses as comps. However, that only accounts for part of your tax valuation.

New house next to an existing one on E Mistletoe Ave.

Between 2015 and 2017, the Bexar Appraisal District increased only the improvements portion of the appraisal by about $2000 on my house, which is across the street from the new Mistletoe development. In that same time, the land value went from $25,000 to $61,000. This is about a 144% increase in just two years. The 2019 valuation has now increased our land value to $177,290. It has nearly doubled again, a 369% increase over four years. 

Sometime between 2015 and now, the Appraisal District realized that the original house on each lot could be torn down and three could be built in its place. Try going to Bexar Appraisal District and arguing that your landis not worth what they say it is.

Since January 2019, the Office of Historic Preservation has received seven demolition applications for Tobin Hill. Of those, three have been approved, two are on hold for evaluation by the Historic Design Review Commission, and two, 430 and 434 E. Magnolia, are still awaiting a decision by OHP. 

Like the properties on Mistletoe, 430 and 434 E. Magnolia are on a quaint and quiet street on the northern end of Tobin Hill.  While this part of Tobin Hill is not currently designated as Historic, it is surrounded on all four sides by Historic Districts: Monte Vista to the north and west, River Road to the east, and the Tobin Hill Historic District to the south. These two homes would be contributing to structures to a future Historic District in this area which has been identified in the past as being eligible for Historic Designation. 

400 block of E Magnolia and E Mistletoe

The applications for the demolition of these houses on E. Magnolia have generated a lot of neighborhood concern. OHP received 24 letters of opposition to the proposed demolition of these homes. This far exceeds what OHP’s Scout SA team typically receives for demolition applications. It was enough that Shanon Shea-Miller, Director of the City of San Antonio’s Office of Historic Preservation, requested a site meeting between Scout SA and the property owner. 

During the meeting with the property owner, we discovered that the owner believes he can get a better offer on the land if it is vacant. However, these houses are occupied and in good structural condition. Demolition should be a last resort, not a quick path to making a buck.  While the Appraisal District views the land as more valuable than the houses built on them, to the renters living there, this is home. 

When taxes go up, it makes it hard to stay in your home. This is how many homeowners go from living in housing that is affordable to becoming cost-burdened by their home. Landlords in my neighborhood, unable to get a homestead exemption on their rental properties, will need to raise rents to cover increased property taxes. Land values that have doubled, or in cases like mine, gone up 369% in just 4 years, mean that rents will rise to compensate for this increase. It is likely that many renters who could afford a place in Tobin Hill North in 2015 will soon be so cost-burdened they will have to find somewhere else to go.

430 and 434 E. Magnolia, photo from Google

430 and 434 E Magnolia are not stunning. They are not what some would consider worthy of a Landmark status. They are humble homes, and some of the last remaining affordable housing we have in Tobin Hill North. They are currently providing affordable housing in an area where finding an apartment or house to live in is becoming increasingly expensive.  The demolition of these homes, which are both currently occupied, and in sound structural condition, will cause the direct displacement of these residents. 

We need to focus on preserving the affordable housing that we already have. San Antonio’s Housing Policy Framework specifically calls for the preservation of naturally-occurring affordable housing, especially rental units, like the duplex at 430 E Magnolia and the home behind it at 434 E Magnolia.  The Policy calls for the prevention and mitigation of displacement, and the need to address the impact of rising property taxes on housing affordability. 

It is clear that in neighborhoods like Tobin Hill North, affordability is tied to the land valuation. Demolitions like the ones proposed on E. Magnolia should be vehemently opposed. Our city: Development Services, the Office of Historic Preservation, our City Council and our Mayor should be denying requests for demolitions on houses that are structurally sound, and especially those that are occupied. It is in the best interests of not only those currently in need of affordable housing, but also of those who live nearby, who don’t want to see exponential growth in their tax bill every year. 

430 and 434 E. Magnolia will go before the Historic Design Review Commission for consideration of Landmark Designation in order to prevent demolition on May 1 at 5:00pm. The Tobin Hill Community Association would appreciate letters in support of the Landmark Designation of 430 and 434 E. Magnolia. Statements can be emailed to jessica.anderson@sanantonio.gov

We are also asking for community support in attending the hearing and speaking in favor of the Landmark designation. If you intend to speak, please sign up in person at 1901 S. Alamo St. on the day of the hearing. You may sign up anytime between 2:30 and 5:00 PM before the cases are heard.  

Request from Tobin Hill at HDRC

Also read: NOWCASTSA’s excellent article: Tobin Hill neighborhood history, character is under fire by city and developers

April 18, 2019 Update from Anisa Schell (THCA Board):

Some of you may already be aware of the proposed demolitions of 430 and 434 E Magnolia. Because of the outcry of concern from the community, and after visiting the site with the Designation/Demolition Committee, the Office of Historic Preservation has decided to move forward with requests for Historic designation of both structures. The cases will be heard at the Historic and Design Review Commission Wednesday, May 1, no earlier than 5 PM in the first-floor boardroom at 1901 S Alamo.

The hearing is public and anyone may attend. 
In the past, it has been very helpful to have a large community of supporters attend and speak at the hearing.  You may sign up to speak before the hearing, anytime between 2:30 and when the case is heard (no sooner than 5:00pm).  

Each person will have three minutes to speak, but a short statement of support is all that is necessary. For example, you can use your time to say something like, “I am Anisa Schell and I live at 430 E. Mistletoe Ave. I support the Landmark Designation of these two houses. 430 and 434 E Magnolia are homes that contribute to the historic nature of the street and our neighborhood. They should not be torn down. Please designate these houses to protect them. Thank you.” 
In addition to speaking at the hearing, writing letters of support for the designation of these houses ahead of time is helpful.  Please send emails to 
Jessica.Anderson@sanantonio.gov. Your email should state that you support the Landmark Designation of 430 and 434 E Magnolia and make sure to include your name and address.  

The emails forwarded below provide a little more insight into what has happened so far with these properties. Also attached is the statement I wrote opposing the demolition of these properties. 

Tobin Hill Community Association needs your support for the historic designation of the two houses at 307 & 309-311 E. Evergreen.  

Demolition applications were filed for these houses in February. In researching the houses, it was discovered that 307 E. Evergreen was the home of Robert G. Cole who went to West Point, and later received the Medal of Honor for his bayonet charge during the Normandy Invasion. Cole has a video game character and local high school named after him (where Shaquille O’Neal went to school as well).

In its more recent history, 311 E Evergreen became locally known as “That Place Off Evergreen.” It was a local recording studio and live music venue, contributing to Tobin Hill’s culture of local music and the performing arts.

307 E Evergreen – photo by CoSA Office of Historic Preservation

The adjacent house, 307 E Evergreen, is known as The Cole House, as well as the former offices of Mujeres Unidas:

“Cole House is also significant in the area of social history for its associations with women’s civic history in the city of San Antonio. Clara Hoff Cole, the house’s longest continuous resident, moved into the house in 1919 and remained until her death in 1949. During that time she was a working professional and single mother of three children, teaching in the Tobin Hill neighborhood at Nathaniel Hawthorne, Jr. High School until sometime around 1944, when she had begun teaching at Mark Twain High School. Her involvement in the community and her son Robert’s military service attracted fairly constant attention from city newspapers through the 1920s, 30s, and 40s. Several decades later the Cole House became the office location of Mujeres Unidas, a charitable organization established in 1994 by Yolanda Rodriguez-Escobar to serve local women and Latinx community members with HIV/AIDS… Although their tenure at the Cole House happened within the past fifty years, it is still noteworthy and adds to the significance of the property in the area of social history and cultural heritage for the community of the Tobin Hill neighborhood and city of San Antonio.”
–Excerpt from 307 E Evergreen Statement of Significance, written and collected by Stephen Fonzo

These cases will go before the Historic Design Review Commission on April 17, 2019 at 5:30PM. Staff is recommending approval of the Landmark designations, however the property owner has not consented. If the homes are not designated, they will be demolished to make room for a multi-unit housing development.  

Your support at the hearing on Wed., April 17 would be appreciated.  The cases are “time certain” and are scheduled to be heard at 5:30PM. You may sign up at the One-Stop, 1901 S. Alamo, to speak any time from about 2:30 P.M. up until the time when the case is heard. (i.e., 5:00).  Emailed comments may be sent ahead of time to the case officer, Jessica Anderson, Jessica.Anderson@sanantonio.gov.

T1NC Letter: HB 2496 Update and How We Made a Difference

March 30, 2019

Dear T1NC Neighbors,

April 3, 2019 Update: The bill has made it out of Committee and will be scheduled by the Calendar Committee next. 

March 29, 2019 Update: There is a second version of HB 2496 that basically mirror’s San Antonio’s process. CoSA’s process is that in order for a case to pass HDRC and Zoning, it needs a majority vote (51%) and requires a supermajority vote (3/4) from City Council.  The revised HB 2496 bill requires a super majority vote by both commissions and CC. That isn’t as impactful for SA because HDRC and Zoning’s decisions are not quasi- judicial (they are recommendations only, unlike Board of Adjustment decisions that stand and do not go on to Council), but it is in other cities and would render them powerless against developers and could be devastating.  There is still an attempt to craft a third version of HB 2496 that would mirror San Antonio’s process exactly. Because it has enough committee members who have signed on, the bill will probably be put on the calendar for a vote. 

March 25, 2019 Update: Neighborhoods have been sending letters and it has made a difference, but last night, (Eastside neighborhoods’) Representative Barbara Gervin-Hawkins (District 120) signed on as a co-author. Barbara.gervin-hawkins@house.texas.gov

March 22, 2019 Update:  HB2496 has been scheduled for Public Hearing for Tuesday, March 26th before the Culture, Recreation, and Tourism Committee.C We will need people to testify in opposition of the bill or at least register their opposition to it via one of the kiosks in the House.  Here’s how to testify.

I just wanted to give you a report back about HB 2496 which is the bill that would require a property owner’s permission to designate a property or district as historic. 

Your letters made a profound difference. I am new to things at the state level and I wasn’t sure about the impact other than what I was told, but letters from voters seem to carry as much weight as information from the experts. 

This bill is about making it easier for developers couched in property-rights rhetoric. After I testified, a developer got up and furiously denounced the Texas Preservation group and neighborhoods. Another person testifying for the bill was a pastor of an African – American church who was upset because he could not tear down a building that was in need of expensive repair to make way for a more modern, less-expensive building to better serve his congregants. He was angry that others could dictate to him what he could do with his church, especially boards that were dominated by what he perceived as outsiders. What he did not mention was that his church was built by John Saunders Chase, described by UT as an architect whose “persistence and courage, as well as the forces of history, made him the first African American to attend graduate school at The University of Texas at Austin and the first licensed black architect in the South.” As you can see this is complicated issue. 

The night before I went to Austin to testify, D120 (Eastside) Representative Barbara Gervin-Hawkins signed on to the bill, giving it a big push forward. I asked Eastside leaders to contact her and they did. It was impressive how fast they were able to get those letters out in a matter of hours. Because of those letters, Jordan Ghawi (who is chair of state legislative issues for T1) and I were able to get a meeting with her after the hearings. She generously gave us almost 45 minutes which was impressive considering she was preparing for the House Budget bill the next which was going to be a 12-hour debate. It was her constituents reaching out that got us that meeting. 

I made the point that in inner-city neighborhoods, historic designation is our most important and only tool to preserve our history, culture, homes, and neighborhoods. It is a tool to prevent displacement. She said she hadn’t realized that the bill had an “unintended” consequence. The letter that the Esperanza Peace and Justice Center and the Westside Preservation Alliance sent help to make this case. 

The Representative said her motivation is that African-American pastors were complaining that they were not able to serve their congregants because they had broken down churches they could not maintain. They wanted to tear them down and rebuild and they were unable to do so, and were frustrated, as evidenced by the Austin pastor who testified. Jordan is going to set up a meeting with those pastors, at least in San Antonio, with Office of Historic Preservation to see if they can get some help.

This is where we are now: 
There is a second version of HB 2496 that basically mirrors San Antonio’s process. CoSA’s process is that in order for a case to pass HDRC and Zoning, it needs a majority vote (51%) and requires a supermajority vote (3/4) from City Council. The revised HB 2496 bill requires a super majority vote by both commissions and CC. That isn’t as impactful for SA because HDRC and Zoning’s decisions are not quasi- judicial (they are recommendations only, unlike Board of Adjustment decisions that stand and do not go on to Council), but they are in other cities and would render them powerless against developers and could be devastating.) There is still an attempt to craft a third version of HB 2496 that would mirror San Antonio’s process exactly. This is the version we could support wholeheartedly. This would be a favorable compromise. Because it has enough committee members who have signed on, more than likely be voted favorable out of committee. 

What I learned is that writing letters (often at the last moment, as things change) and showing up to testify on bills that affect our neighborhoods is extremely important. For upcoming legislation, I would be happy to accompany T1 members to the Capitol and we can navigate the system together. Jordan Ghawi, who sits on the Beacon Hill ANA, has been invaluable keeping us informed and walking me through the system. We can also count on our representatives’ staff to help us as well, at least that is the message that we were given by Representative Diego Bernal and by State Senator Menendez. We are not alone.

Letter Against HB 2496 from the Westside Preservation Alliance and the Esperanza Peace and Justice Center

March 22, 2019                                                           

VIA EMAIL

Rep. John Cyrier 

Chair, Culture, Recreation and Tourism Committee

P.O. Box 2910

Austin, Texas 78768-2910                                          

RE: HB 2496

Mr. Cyrier,

On behalf of the Esperanza Peace & Justice Center and the Westside Preservation Alliance, a community-based historic preservation coalition dedicated to preserving and promoting the history of San Antonio’s Mexican American and working-class communities, we write to expressour opposition to HB 2496, which would prohibit a municipality from designating a historic landmark without the property owner’s consent.

We represent a coalition that is deeply invested in educating the community about the financial and cultural benefits of historic designation. While these benefits vary across the state due to local regulations, in San Antonio the financial benefits of historic designation are quite generous including a 20% tax exemption for up to 10 years, or for substantial rehabilitation the property owner has the choice of a) taxes frozen at the pre-improvement value for up to 10 years or b) owe the city no taxes for 5 years and then pay 50% of assessed post-rehab taxes for the next 5 years. Getting the word out about these relatively new tax incentives has been a slow process, and unfortunately many property owners are still unaware of the long-term financial benefits historic designation offers. For this reason, we believe HB 2496 overreaches in its attempt to apply a blanket policy across our vastly diverse state when historic designation should be a locally decided issue.  

It is important to note that it is quite rare to seek to designate a building as a historic landmark over the objection of the property owner. If such a situation occurs, it is nearly always because the property owner wants to raze the building, while the city wants to save an important and irreplaceable landmark for future generations. HB 2496 would also make it impossible to create meaningful and coherent local historic districts, as 100% owner consent for a local zoning district is almost impossible to obtain. Importantly, no other form of local zoning has such a requirement.

Respectfully,

Esperanza Peace & Justice Center 

Westside Preservation Alliance 

CC: Rep. Armando Martinez (Vice Chair)

Rep. John Bucy III

Rep. Barbara Gervin-Hawkins

Rep. Justin Holland

Rep. Jarvis Johnson

Rep. Geanie Morrison

Rep. Steve Toth

T1NC SC Letter to Lege re HB 2496 and SB1488

Written by Jordan Ghawi on behalf of T1NC SC. We strongly encourage other neighborhoods and coalitions to send letters. Please feel free to use this letter as a template to send to the legislative members listed at bottom (with links).

April 3, 2019 Update: The bill has made it out of Committee and will be scheduled by the Calendar Committee next.

March 29, 2019 Update: There is a second version of HB 2496 that basically mirror’s San Antonio’s process. CoSA’s process is that in order for a case to pass HDRC and Zoning, it needs a majority vote (51%) and requires a supermajority vote (3/4) from City Council.  The revised HB 2496 bill requires a super majority vote by both commissions and CC. That isn’t as impactful for SA because HDRC and Zoning’s decisions are not quasi- judicial (they are recommendations only, unlike Board of Adjustment decisions that stand and do not go on to Council), but it is in other cities and would render them powerless against developers and could be devastating.  There is still an attempt to craft a third version of HB 2496 that would mirror San Antonio’s process exactly. Because it has enough committee members who have signed on, the bill will probably be put on the calendar for a vote.

March 25, 2019 Update: Neighborhoods have been sending letters and it has made a difference, but last night, (Eastside neighborhoods’) Representative Barbara Gervin-Hawkins (District 120) signed on as a co-author. Barbara.gervin-hawkins@house.texas.gov

March 22, 2019 Update: HB2496 has been scheduled for Public Hearing for Tuesday, March 26th before the Culture, Recreation, and Tourism Committee.C We will need people to testify in opposition of the bill or at least register their opposition to it via one of the kiosks in the House.  Here’s how to testify.

Note: HB 2496 and SB 1488: Relating to the designation of a property as a historic landmark by a municipality requiring landowner consent.

Dear Members of the Legislature, 

We write to you as a coalition of 57 San Antonio neighborhoods and 16 partner organizations to express our opposition to HB2496 and SB1488. 

We are deeply concerned that these bills, if passed, would dramatically alter the fabric of our neighborhoods. We wish to preserve the eclectic mix of residential and commercial architecture unique to our communities. At the end of the day, we want our neighborhoods to continue to tell the story of our history to future generations of Texans.  

Our cities and towns have been shaped by our unique histories and legacies, and our built environment helps to tell those stories. Many important buildings and sites in our communities still exist and thrive today because local advocates nominated them for local designation when they were threatened with demolition. Requiring owner consent for designation substantially hinders the ability of local ordinances to serve as effective preservation tools. Most critically, it also prevents concerned citizens from being able to safeguard cultural heritage in their communities. Far too many buildings and site have been lost because community members simply could not save them from the wrecking ball.

If this bill becomes law, our communities’ voices will be silenced. The bill will also significantly impede local municipalities’ abilities to effectively administer their preservation ordinances, which are uniquely tailored to each city. Our local government programs are specifically written to support the community and give our neighborhoods the tools to identify and protect the buildings and places that are most meaningful to us. Without this toolbox, the unique character of Texan cities and towns will be eroded in exchange for often short-sighted, wasteful, and uninspired development that simply aims for maximum profit.

We ask that you please consider the effects of this bill and the subsequent damage that it would do to local communities and our collective history.   

Respectfully, 

Tier One Neighborhood Coalition Steering Committee

Cosima Colvin, Christine Drennon, Tony Garcia, Homer “Butch” Hayes, Cullen Jones, Ricki Kushner, Velma Pena, Cynthia Spielman, Amelia Valdez, and Theresa Ybanez

This letter was sent to the following legislature members.

Co-author: sheryl.cole@house.texas.gov

Rep. Cole’s legislative director: Andre.treiber@house.tx.gov


Sen. Buckingham (author of the Senate companion bill)

dawn.buckingham@senate.texas.gov

Ginny.bell@senate.texas.gov 

Culture, Recreation, and Tourism Committee Members

Rep. Cyrier’s Office (author of the bill)

john.cyrier@house.texas.gov

MeLissa.Nemecek@house.texas.gov

Jacob.Reagan@house.texas.gov

Alonzo.Wood@house.texas.gov

Rep. Martinez’s Office

Mando.martinez@house.texas.gov

scott.jenkines@house.texas.gov

Rep. Bucy’s Office

john.bucy@house.texas.gov

Allison.heinrich@house.texas.gov

Rep. Gervin-Hawkin’s Office

Barbara.gervin-hawkins@house.texas.gov

ashley.thomas@house.texas.gov

jd.pedraza@house.texas.gov

Rep. Holland’s Office

justin.holland@house.texas.gov

Audrey.sirmon@house.texas.gov

Rep. Johnson’s Office

jarvis.johnson@house.texas.gov

Cole.wilson@house.texas.gov

Rep. Kacal’s Office

Kyle.kacal@house.texas.gov

Dade.pritchett@house.texas.gov

Rep. Morrison’s Office

Beanie.morrison@house.texas.gov

Shane.saum@house.texas.gov

Rep. Toth’s Office

Steve.toth@house.texas.gov

Fernando.sosa@house.texas.gov

Local Reps:

Rep. Bernal’s Office

diego.bernal@house.texas.gov

Julia.grizzard@house.texas.gov

mia.balderas@house.texas.gov

Sen. Menendez’s Office

Jose.menendez@senate.texas.gov

Emily.galdeano@senate.texas.gov